Sitting on the sofa after a day of teaching at Progetto Archippo here in Parma. Progetto Archippo is a ministry of Gruppo Cristiano Latino Americano (Latin American Christian Group), a wonderful multicultural church with a great vision that extends far beyond Parma, with a heart to see Italy changed. I was given the topic of leadership, but couldn’t help myself from shifting it every so slightly to something closer to missional leadership. What’s the difference? One accepts the idea that management and status quo can be okay. The other rejects it. Or one allows for the leader to think primarily of the needs of the church. The other thinks of the requirements of mission. There is just something in me, something that is getting stronger each year, that can’t stomach thinking about the church outside of the context of mission. That’s why I couldn’t teach on leadership without filtering it through the needs of mission.
So that’s what I brought to a group of twelve, mostly young, leaders. A bit smaller, perhaps, that hoped and expected, but that’s okay. As I’ve been told before, do your best with the ones who are there, rather than get distracted by the one’s who are not.
We spent the day considering the challenge and call of mission (not an activity for the select few, but the calling of every follower of Jesus) and the part played by church leadership in enabling effective mission (including the search for our vision, protecting the vision, and never letting the church get too settled. I had planned to write a bit more about what I mean by that last part, but it‘ll be long, so I‘ll save that for another entry). There is a lot of hunger to grow here, so it was an easy group to talk with, and the kind of people who seem willing to do what it takes to grow.
It was also a diverse group, representing Italy, Cameroon, Nigeria, Dominican Republic, Brazil, Nicaragua, Ecuador, Columbia, Albania, and probably more.
Speaking on leadership in Italy is not a simple thing. With such awful examples of leadership throughout their history, the concept of leader is not a positive one, and leaders are held with suspicion rather than respect. Think not only of the recent examples of Berlusconi and the never ending parade of recent scandals at all levels of government, but all the way back to people like Mussolini. In fact, Mussolini ruined what would have been the common and helpful word for leader. He was commonly known as ‘Il Duce’, which simply means leader (just like Hitler was called ‘Fuhrer‘). In the aftermath of his time at the top, a time that was a disaster for Italy, it became associated with the kind of leader he was-dictator, authoritarian, brutal. Nothing appropriate for a church leader. Or any leader.
Other words such as ‘direttore’ are also laced with authoritarian or self-serving implications, so they were no help. In the end we were forced to rely on English words like ‘leadership’ and ‘management’, because Italian words without negative meanings attached were simply unavailable. To me, this represents the desperate need for the training of leaders here in Italy. For the church to grow, leadership will have to be redefined and re-explored for the church. It’s hard to see much Kingdom growth if this need isn’t addressed. Unfortunately the lack of healthy leadership has created a legacy of schism and isolationism within the Italian evangelical church, not a good situation in any church, much worse in one so small. Please continue to pray that strong yet serving leaders will be raised up through out Italy, and the good examples that have begun to rise to the surface-such as in the excellent church in Parma-will shape the future of the church in Italy.



















